What lessons can Sarawak learn from the Foshan tram suspension?

Question

Accepted Answer

Lessons for Sarawak from Foshan Hydrogen Tram Suspension

Sarawak's RM6 billion Autonomous Rapid Transit (ART) project faces scrutiny following the suspension of China's Foshan hydrogen tram demonstration line, a technology previously showcased to Sarawak leaders. This development raises concerns about the viability and cost-effectiveness of hydrogen-powered public transport, prompting questions about whether Sarawak has been adequately informed and whether the chosen technology aligns with global trends. The situation underscores the importance of thorough due diligence and a critical assessment of emerging technologies before committing significant public funds.
Concerns Regarding Technology Viability and Cost-Effectiveness

The indefinite suspension of the Foshan hydrogen tram line, operational for nearly five years, due to prolonged low ridership is a significant point of concern for Sarawak's ART project. This demonstration line was presented to Sarawak state leaders by its manufacturer as a prime example of hydrogen-powered public transport. The subsequent decision by Sarawak to proceed with a hydrogen-powered ART project, involving a substantial taxpayer investment of at least RM6 billion, now appears questionable in light of the Foshan line's operational issues. This situation prompts a direct inquiry into the manufacturer's claims and the basis upon which Sarawak leaders made their decision.
Questioning the Practicality and Sustainability of Hydrogen ART

Questions are being raised about the practicality and sustainability of hydrogen-powered ART in Sarawak, particularly when compared to international trends. It is noted that many advanced countries are reportedly moving away from hydrogen fuel for public transport, citing a lack of viability and cost-effectiveness. This raises a critical question: what makes Sarawak believe that hydrogen-powered ART is a suitable or sustainable choice when other nations are deeming it impractical? Furthermore, significant challenges are anticipated in securing a sufficient supply of hydrogen fuel to operate the ART and buses within Sarawak.
Call for Prioritising Basic Infrastructure Development

Amidst concerns about the potential risks associated with the hydrogen ART project, there is a suggestion that Sarawak should re-evaluate its investment priorities. Rather than committing billions to a project that might prove to be a "white elephant," it is argued that public funds would be better allocated to developing essential infrastructure. This includes fundamental projects such as improving roads, constructing bridges, and enhancing educational facilities, which are seen as directly benefiting the broader population and addressing more immediate needs.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What lessons can Sarawak learn from the Foshan tram suspension?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends