What link was the article accused of making between MRCB and project costs?

Question

Accepted Answer

Article Accused MRCB of Being Linked to Project Cost Increases and Delays

An article reportedly linked Malaysian Resources Corporation Bhd (MRCB) to increased costs and delays associated with the LRT3 Shah Alam Line project. MRCB and its executive vice-chairman, Salim Fateh Din, have since filed a RM100 million defamation lawsuit against the journalist, P. Gunasegaram, over the publication.
Allegations of Cronyism and Political Patronage

The lawsuit contends that the article created an impression that MRCB secured the rail project through cronyism, political patronage, and influential connections, rather than through a merit-based, open procurement process. This implication, the plaintiffs argue, falsely suggests impropriety in the awarding of the contract.
Claims of Reliance on Political Ties

Furthermore, the suit alleges that the article implied Salim Fateh Din leveraged political relationships to secure business advantages for MRCB. Both MRCB and Salim Fateh Din have vehemently denied these claims, asserting they are untrue and without basis.
Demand for Damages and Injunctive Relief

MRCB and Salim Fateh Din are seeking RM100 million in damages for the alleged loss to their reputations. They are also requesting general, aggravated, and/or exemplary damages, along with injunctions to have the offending material removed and to prevent the future publication of similar content. The plaintiffs state that the article damaged their credibility, leading to a loss of confidence among investors and business partners, and negatively impacting MRCB's share price.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What link was the article accused of making between MRCB and project costs?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends