What penalty did the Sessions Court impose for spreading false information?

Question

Accepted Answer

Sessions Court Fines Retiree RM2,000 for Spreading False Information Online

A 64-year-old government retiree, Azizan Ahmad, was fined RM2,000 by the Sessions Court for knowingly using his Facebook application to transmit false communication with the intent to annoy others. The charge stemmed from a post made on July 20, 2017, which was read on August 1, 2017, falsely claiming a container of pork and mutton had been imported from Spain and Brazil.
Conviction Under Communications and Multimedia Act

Azizan Ahmad pleaded guilty to an offence under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. This legislation addresses the misuse of network facilities to transmit offensive or false communications. The Act stipulates penalties including a fine of up to RM50,000, a jail term of up to one year, or both, along with a daily fine of RM1,000 for ongoing violations.
Details of the False Communication

The specific false information disseminated by Azizan Ahmad claimed that a container carrying pork and mutton had been brought into the country. This communication was read by Mohd Nazri Abdul Wahid, who subsequently filed a report with the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC).
Court's Sentencing and Legal Framework

The Sessions Court imposed a RM2,000 fine on Azizan Ahmad. The prosecuting officer from the MCMC had requested this specific fine amount. The incident highlights the legal consequences for individuals found guilty of spreading misinformation that causes annoyance or disruption, under the framework of Malaysia's communications laws.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What penalty did the Sessions Court impose for spreading false information?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends