What proactive measures can authorities take against misleading property ads?

Question

Accepted Answer

Authorities can implement unannounced inspections and prosecute developers for misleading advertisements.

Authorities can take proactive measures against misleading property advertisements by conducting unannounced inspections of developers' offices and prosecuting those found to have deliberately misled buyers. The Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 already stipulate the types of information developers can and cannot include in property advertisements, and developers are required to submit brochures and promotional materials to the National Housing Department for approval. However, the National House Buyers Association of Malaysia (HBA) highlights that despite known violations, there have been no prosecutions to date, diminishing the deterrent effect.
Unannounced Inspections to Verify Compliance

To enhance compliance, authorities should undertake unannounced inspections and surprise visits to developers' offices. This practice would allow for the verification of adherence to advertising regulations and the identification of misleading or unauthorised promotional materials before they reach a wider audience of potential buyers. Such proactive checks are crucial for identifying discrepancies between advertised claims and actual project realities, as noted by HBA.
Prosecution and Blacklisting for Deliberate Misrepresentation

Developers found to have deliberately misled buyers should face consequences beyond mere warnings. The HBA advocates for these developers to not only be blacklisted but also to be prosecuted. The absence of prosecution, despite known violations, undermines the effectiveness of existing regulations and allows irresponsible practices to persist, as highlighted by HBA's Datuk Chang Kim Loong.
Legal Recourse for Misled Buyers

Buyers who believe they have been misled by property advertisements have legal avenues for redress. Lawyers suggest that representations made in brochures can form part of the sale and purchase agreement, and buyers may pursue civil action. This can include seeking damages or, in certain circumstances, the invalidation of the sale and purchase agreement, as demonstrated in cases where courts have awarded damages to buyers for misrepresentation. Buyers generally have six years from the signing of the agreement to take legal action and must preserve crucial evidence like original brochures.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What proactive measures can authorities take against misleading property ads?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends