What procedural lapses in judicial appointments did the AGC confirm?

Question

Accepted Answer

AGC Statement Confirms Procedural Lapses in Judicial Appointments

The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has inadvertently confirmed several procedural lapses concerning recent judicial appointments, aligning with concerns previously raised by nine PKR Members of Parliament. These confirmations include delays in the appointment process, failure to act on certain nominees from the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), and the convening of a JAC meeting without the mandated 10-day notice.
Delays in Appointment Process

The AGC’s statement acknowledged that delays occurred within the judicial appointment process. These delays have fueled speculation that the executive branch might be attempting to influence the selection of judges for positions ranging from the High Court to the Federal Court.
Unacted-Upon JAC Nominees

It was also confirmed by the AGC that some nominees put forward by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) were not acted upon. This suggests a potential breakdown in the seamless progression of candidates through the appointment pipeline.
Irregular JAC Meeting Convened

Furthermore, the AGC confirmed that a meeting of the JAC was convened without adhering to the required 10-day notice period. This procedural irregularity raises questions about the proper conduct of commission meetings.
Discussion of Allegations Against Federal Court Judge

Crucially, the AGC acknowledged that a meeting of the JAC had discussed allegations pertaining to a Federal Court judge. These allegations specifically concerned attempts by the judge to influence case decisions and reassign other judges, indicating serious internal concerns within the judiciary.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What procedural lapses in judicial appointments did the AGC confirm?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends