What role did political favouritism play in past Syrian equestrian results?

Question

Accepted Answer

Political Favouritism Dictated Past Syrian Equestrian Results

In past Syrian equestrian competitions, political favouritism significantly influenced outcomes, consistently ensuring that individuals close to the ruling Assad family and their inner circle achieved favourable results. This systemic advantage created a near-insurmountable barrier for other competitors, effectively predetermining the success of those affiliated with the government. The practice was so entrenched that achieving a high placing, or even competing on equal footing, was considered impossible for those outside the ruling elite.
Pre-arranged Outcomes Favoured the Ruling Elite

For decades, equestrian events in Syria were structured in a manner where results were pre-decided, with the clear intention of favouring those connected to the government. This meant that the competitive landscape was not based on merit but on political allegiance. Competitors like Ziad Abu al-Dahab, a rider in his mid-twenties, experienced this firsthand, stating that his ambition was once limited to achieving third place due to the overwhelming advantage held by the ruling family.
Superior Resources Provided to the Inner Circle

A key element of the favouritism was the disparity in resources, particularly the quality of horses. Those aligned with the Assad family had access to superior European breeds that significantly outperformed the local horses available to other riders. This created an uneven playing field where the physical capabilities of the animals, rather than the skill of the rider, often dictated the competition's outcome. This access to elite equine talent was a tangible manifestation of the privileges enjoyed by the ruling family and their associates.
Intimidation and Persecution Discouraged Competition

The pervasive influence of the ruling family extended to creating an environment of intimidation that deterred potential competitors. Munana Shaker, for instance, was forbidden from participating by her father due to fear of repercussions from the ruling family. Her father recounted the case of Adnan Qassar, a rider jailed in 1993 after outperforming Bassel al-Assad, with many believing his sporting success was the true reason for his imprisonment. Qassar was eventually freed after 21 years, highlighting the severe consequences faced by those who dared to challenge the established order within the sport. Furthermore, approximately 40 horses were exclusively reserved for the Assad family, with strict prohibitions against any other riders approaching them, underscoring the exclusive and controlling nature of their dominance.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What role did political favouritism play in past Syrian equestrian results?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends