What sentence did the court impose for falsifying delivery orders?

Question

Accepted Answer

Court Sentences Perak Works Department Assistant Accountant to 12 Months Jail and RM70,000 Fine for Document Forgery

A 40-year-old civil servant has been sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment and a total fine of RM70,000 after pleading guilty to 14 charges of falsifying delivery orders, request notes, and invoices. The court ordered the jail sentences to be served concurrently.
Falsification of Delivery Orders and Related Documents

Roslan Al Sidek Sulaiman, an assistant accountant at the Perak Works Department's mechanical engineering branch, admitted to falsifying documents from three companies: Musmar Entreprise, Aladin Emas Enterprise, and Mizie Auto Enterprise. These falsifications were made with the intent to cheat and claim payments for the purchase of petrol, diesel, and lubricants. The offences occurred on multiple occasions between September 9, 2014, and August 7, 2015.
Penal Code Provisions and Penalties

The charges were brought under Section 471 of the Penal Code, with penalties prescribed by Section 468 of the same Act. This legislation stipulates a potential imprisonment of up to seven years and a fine for such offences. The total loss incurred due to these fraudulent claims amounted to RM75,438.70.
Judicial Sentencing and Mitigation Plea

Judge S. Indra Nehru imposed a sentence of 12 months' jail and a RM5,000 fine for each of the 14 charges, with a default imprisonment of one month for each charge if the fine is not paid. The judge ordered that all jail sentences run concurrently, meaning the individual will serve a total of 12 months. Roslan had sought a lighter sentence, citing his responsibility to care for his three school-going children, his unemployed wife who has health issues, and his elderly parents, while also highlighting his full cooperation with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).
Prosecution's Stance on Punishment

The MACC deputy public prosecutor, Azmi Yusuf, acknowledged Roslan's cooperation during the investigation. However, he argued that a fair punishment was necessary to serve as a deterrent, not only for the accused but also for the public. The prosecution maintained that despite the cooperation, the gravity of the offence warranted a significant penalty.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What sentence did the court impose for falsifying delivery orders?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends