What specific acts constituted the public nuisance charges?

Question

Accepted Answer

Specific Acts Constituting Public Nuisance Charges Detailed

A 63-year-old woman, Viona Teo Kee Liok, has been granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal for seven charges related to causing annoyance through the alleged tossing of waste onto the parapet of a Housing Board flat. These charges, which occurred between December 25, 2025, and January 12, 2026, at Block 131 Marsiling Rise, specifically detail multiple instances of waste disposal. The discharge means Teo could still be prosecuted if new evidence emerges, with the district judge approving the prosecution's request on February 16.
Tossing of Human Waste

The most frequent accusation against Teo involved the alleged throwing of human waste onto the unit's parapet. This specific act was cited four times within the period of the alleged offences, forming the majority of the charges.
Disposal of Food Waste

In addition to human waste, Teo was also accused of discarding food waste onto the parapet. These instances of allegedly throwing food waste occurred twice, contributing to the overall charges of causing annoyance.
Combined Waste Disposal

The charges also encompassed an incident where a combination of both human waste and food waste was allegedly thrown onto the parapet. This seventh charge, occurring between the specified dates, involved a mix of the aforementioned waste types.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific acts constituted the public nuisance charges?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends