What specific claims in property ads can developers not substantiate?

Question

Accepted Answer

Specific Claims in Property Advertisements That Developers Cannot Substantiate

Developers are prohibited from making unsubstantiated claims in property advertisements, encompassing aspects like travel times to popular destinations, panoramic views, and descriptions of exclusivity or low density that may not hold true once a development is occupied. These regulations aim to prevent misrepresentation and ensure potential buyers receive accurate information before making purchasing decisions. Developers found to be in breach of these rules face penalties including fines up to RM50,000, imprisonment for up to five years, or both.
Prohibited Descriptions in Advertising Materials

Developers are legally required to submit their brochures and promotional materials to the National Housing Department for approval before they can be distributed to prospective buyers. Regulation 8(1A) of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 explicitly forbids developers from including claims that cannot be genuinely substantiated. This includes specific descriptions such as a property being "walking distance" to certain locations if this creates a false impression, or claims about travel time from a housing project to popular destinations.
Misleading Terms and Their Real-World Impact

Common phrases used in property advertisements that can lead to buyer expectations not reflecting reality include statements like "walking distance or just five minutes from the city." While the physical distance may remain the same, the actual travel experience can differ significantly once a development is fully occupied and the surrounding area experiences increased traffic congestion. Similarly, a development marketed as "exclusive" or "low-density" might become highly congested, leading to longer waits for amenities like lifts and increased traffic bottlenecks.
Examples of Undelivered Facilities and Features

Misrepresentations can also extend to the non-delivery of facilities or features that were heavily promoted during the sales process. Examples include promised amenities such as a gymnasium, water fountain, Japanese landscape garden, or rooftop garden that are not present upon the property's completion. These discrepancies can significantly impact a buyer's perception of value and the overall quality of life.
Legal Recourse for Misled Buyers

Buyers who believe they have been misled by property advertisements have legal avenues available to seek redress. Generally, buyers have a six-year period from the signing of the sale and purchase agreement to initiate legal action. A notable case, Toh Shu Hua & Ors v Wawasan Rajawali Sdn Bhd (2023) 2 CLJ 310, saw apartment buyers successfully sue a developer for misrepresentation, with the court awarding damages. This ruling underscored that promotional brochures can be considered part of the representations made by developers, and inaccurate or misleading statements within them can lead to legal consequences.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific claims in property ads can developers not substantiate?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends