What specific clauses in the draft bill concern PKR lawmakers?

Question

Accepted Answer

Clause 18 of the Draft Constitutional Amendments is a Point of Contention for PKR Lawmakers

PKR lawmakers have expressed significant concerns regarding Clause 18 of the proposed constitutional amendments, arguing that its current provisions for parliamentary oversight are inadequate. They contend that the mechanism outlined in this clause fails to provide a meaningful role for the Dewan Rakyat in the vetting of candidates for the Public Prosecutor position, advocating instead for a more robust and transparent process.
Insufficient Parliamentary Notification Mechanism

The core of the concern surrounding Clause 18 lies in its stipulated requirement for the Judicial and Legal Service Commission. As it stands, the clause reportedly mandates that the Commission merely inform Parliament of any nominated names and provide an opportunity for comments. PKR lawmakers view this notification process as insufficient, suggesting it allows Parliament to be informed but not to actively participate in a rigorous examination of potential candidates for the nation's top prosecutorial role.
Call for Bipartisan Vetting and Open Hearings

In response to the perceived shortcomings of Clause 18, PKR lawmakers are demanding a more comprehensive approach. They advocate for the implementation of a bipartisan parliamentary vetting process for all nominees proposed by the Judicial and Legal Service Commission. This process, they argue, should include open and transparent hearings where Parliament, acting on behalf of the public, can thoroughly scrutinise the nominees before any appointment is finalised.
Opposition to a "Rubber Stamp" Role

PKR lawmakers have explicitly stated their refusal to act as a "mere rubber stamp" for the government's proposed amendments. They believe that Members of Parliament have a national duty to scrutinise bills carefully, ensuring that reforms promote better governance. The current mechanism in Clause 18, according to Subang MP Wong Chen, is seen as "perfunctory and devoid of genuine oversight," prompting the call for a more substantive parliamentary role in the appointment of the Public Prosecutor.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific clauses in the draft bill concern PKR lawmakers?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends