What specific court order did the six individuals allegedly breach?

Question

Accepted Answer

High Court Ad Interim Injunction Restrains DKU Meetings and Actions

The six individuals are alleged to have breached an ad interim injunction granted by the High Court, which specifically restrained them from convening or holding any Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) meetings, including a Special Sitting scheduled for the day the injunction was granted. The court order also prohibited them from interfering with the duties of the DKU secretary and from making decisions impacting the DKU's administration.
Prohibition on Convening DKU Meetings

The High Court's ad interim injunction explicitly barred the six plaintiffs from convening or holding any DKU meeting. This prohibition extended to personal participation as well as actions taken through agents, nominees, or appointees. This order was in place pending further court proceedings and the court's determination on jurisdictional and justiciability issues.
Restriction on Interfering with Secretary's Duties

Furthermore, the injunction restrained the plaintiffs from suspending, removing, or interfering with the duties of Raja Norazli Nordin in his capacity as the DKU secretary. This measure was to remain in effect until further court proceedings could take place.
Bar on Assuming Secretary's Powers and Decision-Making

The court order also prevented the plaintiffs from creating or empowering any committee, person, or body to assume the powers and functions of the DKU secretary. Additionally, they were barred from making or implementing decisions concerning the administration, governance, and affairs of the DKU.
Maintenance of Status Quo

Crucially, the injunction prevented the plaintiffs from taking any steps that would alter or interfere with the status quo of the DKU as it existed immediately before May 21. This aimed to preserve the existing state of affairs within the institution while legal disputes were being resolved.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific court order did the six individuals allegedly breach?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends