What specific EPF information was delayed in action?

Question

Accepted Answer

The police delayed acting on EPF-provided employer-address information tied to Muhammad Riduan Abdullah and his current wife

The delayed action involved critical information received from the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) on April 24, 2026, concerning the employers of Muhammad Riduan Abdullah and his current wife, who was believed to be based in Kelantan. Even after the EPF provided the employers’ addresses, the police only began investigating on June 15, nearly two months later.
EPF information tied to two people and their employers
The EPF information related to the employers of Muhammad Riduan Abdullah and his current wife. The wife was believed to be based in Kelantan, and the EPF details pointed officers to the employers connected to both individuals.
The delayed part was the use of the employers’ addresses
The EPF provided the employers’ addresses, but the police did not move to investigate until June 15. When officers later arrived at the address linked to the wife’s employer, the premises were locked and unoccupied.
EPF did not specify when withdrawals were made
While the EPF supplied the employers’ addresses, it did not specify when the relevant withdrawals had been made. That gap meant the timing of the employer information was not clearly tied to a specific withdrawal date.
The delay spanned nearly two months after the EPF lead
The lead was received on April 24, 2026, and investigation started on June 15. In the court monitoring process, Indira’s lawyer highlighted this nearly two-month interval as the core delay in police action after the EPF information was obtained.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific EPF information was delayed in action?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends