What specific legal grounds does the Malaysian Bar cite against the appointment?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Malaysian Bar Cites Procedural and Conventional Grounds in Challenging Justice Ahmad Terrirudin's JAC Appointment

The Malaysian Bar has initiated legal proceedings to challenge the appointment of Federal Court Judge Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). The Bar's application seeks to quash the Prime Minister's decision, compel adherence to legal and conventional appointment processes, and establish a royal commission of inquiry into allegations against Justice Ahmad Terrirudin. The core of the Bar's argument rests on the assertion that the appointment process, as exercised, deviates from established legal requirements and conventions, despite the Attorney General's counter-argument that the appointment meets the statutory criteria.
Grounds for Judicial Review and Declaratory Relief

The Bar's application to the High Court includes a request for a certiorari order to quash the Prime Minister's decision to appoint Justice Ahmad Terrirudin to the JAC. Furthermore, the Bar seeks a declaration that the appointment is unlawful, null, and void. This aspect of the challenge suggests a contention that the appointment itself, irrespective of the individual's qualifications, was made through a flawed process that contravenes the principles governing judicial appointments. The Bar is also seeking a stay of the appointment pending the judicial review's outcome, indicating a concern about the immediate impact of the appointment.
Allegations Warranting a Royal Commission

A significant component of the Bar's challenge involves seeking a mandamus order for the establishment of a royal commission of inquiry. This commission, according to the Bar's application, would investigate unspecified allegations against Justice Ahmad Terrirudin, with the findings intended to be made public. While the specific nature of these allegations is not detailed in the provided information, their inclusion in the legal challenge underscores a concern about the integrity or suitability of the appointed individual, prompting a demand for a thorough, independent investigation.
Mandamus for Adherence to Law and Convention

The Malaysian Bar is also seeking a mandamus order to compel the Prime Minister to exercise his prerogative in appointing JAC members in strict accordance with Malaysian law, established conventions, and the JAC Act. This plea highlights the Bar's belief that the current appointment of Justice Ahmad Terrirudin may have bypassed or inadequately followed the established legal framework and customary practices for such appointments. The reference to "established conventions" suggests that the Bar perceives a departure from long-standing norms and practices that are considered integral to the integrity of the judicial appointment process.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific legal grounds does the Malaysian Bar cite against the appointment?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends