What specific motions were meant to be debated at the dissolved Bar EGM?

Question

Accepted Answer

Specific motions intended for debate at the Malaysian Bar's dissolved EGM

The Malaysian Bar's extraordinary general meeting (EGM), convened to discuss critical issues including judicial independence, was dissolved due to a failure to meet the required quorum of 500 members, with only 309 lawyers attending. The session intended to debate three distinct motions, covering judicial independence, accountability of the prime minister, and fair remuneration for pupils.
Motion on Judicial Independence

A primary motion, explicitly titled "Judicial Independence," was slated for debate. This motion was intended to be led by the Malaysian Bar president himself, Ezri Abdul Wahab, highlighting the council's focus on this core issue.
Motion to Hold Prime Minister Accountable

A second motion aimed to address concerns regarding public confidence in the judiciary. Proposed by senior lawyers Malik Imtiaz Sarwar and Surendra Ananth, this motion sought to hold the prime minister accountable for actions perceived to be undermining this confidence.
Motion on Pupil Remuneration

The third motion tabled concerned the welfare of junior legal practitioners. Proposed by Goh Cia Yee and Vince Tan, this motion focused on the implementation of fair minimum remuneration for legal pupils, addressing a key aspect of professional development and economic fairness within the legal fraternity.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific motions were meant to be debated at the dissolved Bar EGM?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends