What specific PAC findings on KLIA2 has the minister ignored?

Question

Accepted Answer

Minister Liow Tiong Lai Has Not Adhered to PAC Recommendations on KLIA2 Audit

Transport Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai has reportedly refused to implement the Public Accounts Committee's (PAC) recommendation for an in-depth audit of the second Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA2) by the Auditor-General. This stance has drawn criticism, with accusations that the minister is shielding those responsible for the project's significant cost escalation. The PAC had previously concluded that questionable decisions by Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB) were the primary drivers behind the budget overrun.
PAC Findings on Questionable Decisions by MAHB

The PAC's investigation confirmed that specific "questionable decisions" made by Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB) were instrumental in the KLIA2 project's cost ballooning. These decisions led to the project's budget increasing from an initial RM1.7 billion to a final figure of RM4 billion. MAHB itself had previously acknowledged cost overruns amounting to RM3.9 billion by November 2011, a figure that later rose to RM4 billion as stated in Parliament in October 2012 by the then deputy Transport Minister.
Minister's Rejection of In-Depth Audit

Despite the PAC's findings and recommendations, Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai has publicly stated that there were no cost overruns. He attributed the increased expenditure to an expansion of the project's scope driven by a new design concept. Furthermore, the minister contended that the "detailed needs" of various stakeholders, including aviation companies and government entities, also contributed to the higher construction costs. This position directly contradicts the PAC's conclusion that MAHB's decisions were the root cause of the financial escalation.
Contrast with Predecessor's Actions

The current stance of Minister Liow is contrasted with that of his predecessor, Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat. When faced with the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal, Ong Tee Keat had proactively ordered an independent audit to be conducted by a private firm. This action is presented as an example of ensuring accountability and transparency in large-scale government-related projects, a measure critics argue is lacking in the current handling of the KLIA2 situation.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What specific PAC findings on KLIA2 has the minister ignored?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends