Which company was allegedly favoured in the supply deals?

Question

Accepted Answer

Orean Collection Was Allegedly Favoured in School Supply Deals

A secondary school principal has been charged with three counts of abuse of power for allegedly favouring Orean Collection in supply deals for school activities. Norliza Mat Radzi, 48, pleaded not guilty to all charges, which involved a total value of RM6,591.65. The alleged offences occurred at a school in Port Klang between February 12 and April 13.
Principal Used Position to Appoint Orean Collection

Norliza Mat Radzi is accused of leveraging her role as principal to appoint Orean Collection for the supply of various goods. She held an interest in this company as its owner. This alleged preferential treatment extended to the procurement of teaching aids, small towels, and stationery for school programmes.
Total Value of Deals Amounted to RM6,591.65

The charges detail specific instances of alleged abuse of power, including the appointment of Orean Collection for teaching aids valued at RM2,091.65. Further appointments involved small towels worth RM500 and a package of five hampers, files, stationery, and medals totalling RM4,000. The cumulative value of these alleged favoured transactions reached RM6,591.65.
Charges Brought Under MACC Act 2009

The principal was charged under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009. This section pertains to the abuse of power by a public officer. Conviction under this act carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and a fine that is five times the value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher.
Bail Set and Passport Surrendered

Sessions Court Judge Rozilah Salleh granted Norliza Mat Radzi bail amounting to RM5,000 with one surety for each charge. She was also ordered to surrender her passport to the court until the conclusion of her case. The next mention date for the case has been set for December 2.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Which company was allegedly favoured in the supply deals?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends