Who failed to claim the RM169 million in forfeited cash?

Question

Accepted Answer

Forfeiture of RM169 Million Cash Allowed Amidst No Claims Filed

The Malaysian government has successfully secured over RM169 million in cash, previously seized by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), in a forfeiture proceeding where no third party came forward to contest the claim. This significant sum, allegedly linked to former prime minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob, was ordered to be surrendered to the government by Sessions Court Judge Suzana Hussin. The lack of any objections or third-party claims led to the forfeiture being allowed under Section 41(1) of the MACC Act.
No Objections Filed by Named Respondents

Sessions Court Judge Suzana Hussin ordered the forfeiture of the cash after being informed that the named respondents, Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob and his former political secretary Datuk Mohammad Anuar Mohd Yunus, had no intention of challenging the prosecution's application. This communication was conveyed to the court on September 8, paving the way for the forfeiture order to be granted.
MACC Initiated Forfeiture Proceedings

The MACC sought the forfeiture order following its determination that the seized cash belonged to Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob and was connected to an offence under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act, which pertains to the failure to declare assets. The seized money was reportedly held by Mohammad Anuar.
Multiple Currencies Comprised the Forfeited Sum

The forfeited amount of over RM169 million was not solely in Malaysian ringgit. The cash comprised various foreign currencies, including Singapore dollars, Swiss francs, euros, Japanese yen, British pounds, New Zealand dollars, and Australian dollars. This broad mix of currencies underscores the scale of the assets involved in the investigation.
Government Gazette Issued Without Claims

A federal government gazette notice was issued on September 22 and subsequently filed through the e-judiciary system, as confirmed by Deputy Public Prosecutor Mahadi Abdul Jumaat. This formal notification process also did not result in any third party making a claim to the forfeited assets, further solidifying the grounds for the court's decision.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Who failed to claim the RM169 million in forfeited cash?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends