Why are bribes linked to extending an OSC contract in China central to the case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Appeal Case Management Set for July 28 in Foreign Visa System Corruption Allegations

The Court of Appeal has scheduled July 28 for further case management concerning the prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi on corruption charges. These charges are linked to the foreign visa (VLN) system and the extension of a contract held by Ultra Kirana Sdn Bhd (UKSB). The prosecution is seeking to review the High Court's decision to acquit and discharge Ahmad Zahid, who previously served as the home minister, of all allegations.
Allegations of Bribery for Contract Extension

Ahmad Zahid faces 33 charges for allegedly receiving bribes totalling S$13.56 million from UKSB. These payments were purportedly made to him in his capacity as home minister to facilitate the extension of UKSB's contract. This contract involved operating a one-stop centre (OSC) service in China and managing the VLN system, as well as maintaining the integrated system's contract with the home ministry. The alleged offences occurred between October 2014 and March 2018.
Role of the Home Minister in the VLN System

The case hinges on the alleged role of the home minister in awarding and extending contracts related to the VLN system. UKSB was contracted to operate a one-stop centre (OSC) service in China, which likely streamlined visa application processes for Chinese citizens seeking to enter Malaysia. Additionally, UKSB was responsible for supplying the VLN integrated system. The prosecution contends that bribes were exchanged to ensure these contractual arrangements remained in place.
Alternative Charges and Other Financial Transactions

In addition to the primary charges, Ahmad Zahid also faces 33 alternative charges under Section 165 of the Penal Code. These charges also relate to receiving bribes amounting to S$13.56 million in connection with the VLN system between 2014 and 2017, again in his capacity as home minister. Furthermore, seven other charges allege that he obtained cash and foreign currency, including S$1,150,000, RM3 million, 15,000 Swiss francs, and US$15,000, from UKSB between June 2015 and October 2017, which he allegedly knew had a connection to his official duties.
Prosecution's Appeal Focuses on Factual and Legal Findings

The prosecution filed its notice of appeal against the Shah Alam High Court's decision, which had ruled that a prima facie case had not been established. In their petition of appeal, the prosecution outlined 14 reasons. These reasons primarily focus on the High Court judge's findings of fact and law, specifically questioning whether bribery occurred in the context of the money exchanged for the VLN system contract. The Attorney-General's Chambers is reportedly considering Ahmad Zahid's representation to discontinue the appeal.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why are bribes linked to extending an OSC contract in China central to the case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends