Why are former Bar presidents concerned about the potential CJM appointment?

Question

Accepted Answer

Former Bar Presidents Express Concerns Over Potential Chief Judge of Malaya Appointment

Former presidents of the Malaysian Bar have voiced significant concerns regarding reports of Attorney General Datuk Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh potentially being appointed as the next Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM). Their apprehension stems from the belief that appointing an "outsider" to this high judicial office, when qualified Federal Court judges are available, could undermine the Judiciary's integrity and public trust. This situation is compounded by the extended vacancy of the CJM position, which has been unfilled for four-and-a-half months since the mandatory retirement of Justice Tan Sri Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah on February 29.
Concerns Regarding Qualifications and Judicial Morale

A primary point of contention for the former Bar presidents is Terrirudin's lack of judicial experience at the High Court or appellate court levels, which they argue raises questions about his suitability for the CJM role. They contend that appointing an individual without prior judicial service to such a significant position could adversely affect the morale of existing judges and the Judiciary as a whole. This perception of potential external influence in judicial appointments, they believe, gravely compromises public confidence in the independence of the Judiciary and the administration of justice.
Allegations of Executive Interference

The extended delay in filling the CJM vacancy, which has now persisted for over four months, has led the group to suggest the possibility of executive interference in the appointment process. They stated that such an "inordinate and unaccountable delay" does not bode well for the nation, leaving the future of the Judiciary and justice administration in a state of uncertainty. The former presidents emphasised that the Judiciary's crucial role within the constitutional framework must not be diminished by excessive executive influence or power.
Alternative Candidates and Current Interim Arrangement

The former Bar presidents implicitly argue that qualified Federal Court judges should be considered for the CJM position, suggesting that there is no "cogent and compelling reason" to appoint an outsider. Media reports had indicated that Terrirudin might be appointed as a Federal Court judge, with a potential future move to the CJM role, or be appointed to the apex court while the CJM position remained vacant. Currently, the duties of the CJM are being performed on an interim basis by Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, the President of the Court of Appeal. Terrirudin previously served as the solicitor general before his appointment as Attorney General on September 6 last year.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why are former Bar presidents concerned about the potential CJM appointment?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends