Why are some Muslims selective about religious freedom for others?

Question

Accepted Answer

Some Malay Muslims Exhibit Hypocrisy Regarding Religious Freedom and Freedom of Speech

The cancellation of Islamic scholar Zakir Naik's talk, "Similarities between Hinduism and Islam," in Malaysia, has highlighted perceived double standards among some Malay Muslims concerning religious freedom and freedom of speech. This selectiveness manifests in how these principles are applied when they align with their interests or beliefs, versus when they challenge them or involve other faiths. The issue is not solely with external figures but with the internal inconsistencies observed within a segment of the Malay Muslim community.
Double Standards on Freedom of Speech

A significant point of contention is the selective application of freedom of speech. When Islamic scholars or individuals express views that resonate with or are considered inflammatory but align with their own perspectives, some Malay Muslims champion freedom of speech. However, this support appears to wane when other religious groups or individuals express differing opinions or when Islam faces criticism. For instance, the article contrasts the outcry over Naik's cancelled talk with the denial of entry for Dr. Ulil Abshar Abdalla in 2014, who was reportedly barred for being a "deviant" despite intending to speak against terrorism, while Naik, known for controversial statements including support for Osama Bin Laden, was initially permitted to speak.
Inconsistent Application of Religious Freedom

The principle of religious freedom is also inconsistently applied. On one hand, the propagation of Islam, the defence of converts, and the protection of individuals who embrace Islam are often justified under the umbrella of religious freedom. Conversely, this freedom seems to be curtailed when it pertains to individuals wishing to legally change their religion, as exemplified by the case of Lina Joy, or when considering the rights of religious minorities. This suggests a framework where religious freedom is largely interpreted as the freedom to practice and promote Islam, rather than a mutual right for all faiths.
Lack of Reciprocity in Religious Respect

Furthermore, there is a critique regarding the expectation of respect for Islam while not extending the same courtesy to other religions. The article points to instances where protests have been held against the construction of Hindu temples and where churches have faced attacks or been pressured to remove religious symbols. This behaviour stands in contrast to the outrage sometimes expressed over the mistreatment of Muslim minorities in other countries, where calls for peace and harmony are made. This indicates a tendency to demand respect for one's own faith without consistently offering it to others.
Selective Condemnation of Religious Exclusion

The selective nature of condemning religious exclusion, or takfir, is another area highlighted. While some Malay Muslims rallied against the excommunication of other Muslims with differing opinions, they are also quick to label individuals or groups with unorthodox views as 'kafir' (infidel). This hypocrisy is further illustrated by the criticism faced by organisations like Sisters In Islam, which are labelled "deviant" for their progressive interpretations, a reaction that is not always met with the same vigour of defence as when Muslims with differing views from external critics are involved. This pattern suggests that the application of principles like justice and freedom is often contingent on convenience and personal alignment rather than universal application.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why are some Muslims selective about religious freedom for others?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends