Why did Dzulkefly Ahmad file a defamation suit against Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki?

Question

Accepted Answer

Dzulkefly Ahmad Filed a Defamation Suit Over Allegations of Cronyism and Nepotism in Daughter's Appointment

Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad initiated a defamation suit against Datuk Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki on April 12, 2022, stemming from a Twitter post made by Asyraf on August 24, 2020. The post, which was also shared on Facebook, allegedly implied that Dzulkefly, in his capacity as health minister, engaged in cronyism and nepotism by appointing his daughter to the Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) board for personal and family benefit. Dzulkefly contends these statements are baseless and damaging to his reputation.
Allegations of Misuse of Power

The core of the defamation claim rests on the assertion that Dzulkefly misused his ministerial position to secure an appointment for his daughter. The contested Twitter post, widely disseminated, suggested a pattern of favouritism, specifically linking his daughter's role on the AIM board to his influence as the then health minister. This implication of unethical conduct formed the basis of the legal action.
Dzulkefly's Defence Against the Claims

Dzulkefly's legal filing refutes the allegations, stating that his daughter's appointment was based on merit and qualifications, with an objective evaluation process. He further highlighted that at the time of the appointment, AIM was under the purview of a government-appointed Board of Trustees during the Barisan Nasional administration, and he was not serving as a minister at that juncture. The Ministry of Health also issued a statement confirming its non-involvement in the appointment.
Seeking Damages and Rectification

In his lawsuit, Dzulkefly is seeking substantial compensation for general, aggravated, and exemplary damages. Beyond financial redress, he is also requesting an injunction to prevent Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki from reposting or further disseminating the allegedly defamatory content. Additionally, Dzulkefly seeks a formal written apology to be published either on Asyraf's Twitter account or in a local newspaper, subject to Dzulkefly's choice.
Court Proposes Amicable Resolution

During proceedings on March 14, the Sessions Court Judge Norakhmar Mohd Sani proposed that the parties explore an amicable resolution to the dispute. The court suggested that a settlement could be reached before the trial, which was scheduled for January 20 to 24, 2025. This proposal comes after the trial, initially set for the current date, was postponed due to Dzulkefly's ill health.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did Dzulkefly Ahmad file a defamation suit against Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends