Why did EAIC deny claims its report was classified secret?

Question

Accepted Answer

EAIC Denies Classification of Death in Custody Investigation Report as Secret

The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) has refuted claims that its report concerning the death of Syed Mohd Azlan Syed Mohamed Nur in police custody was classified as secret. Chairman Datuk A. Aziz A. Rahim stated that the report was never confidential and has been publicly available since October 30, 2015, in compliance with Section 30(5) of Act 700. The commission clarified that the investigation's primary objective was to ascertain any foul play or misconduct by police personnel, not to aid in civil legal proceedings.
Report Was Publicly Accessible Since 2015

Contrary to allegations made by the family's lawyer, the EAIC chairman confirmed that the investigation report was not classified as confidential. The report was published and uploaded across all of the EAIC's media platforms, making it accessible to the public from October 30, 2015. This accessibility is in accordance with the provisions of Section 30(5) of Act 700, ensuring transparency regarding the findings.
Investigation Aimed at Police Misconduct, Not Civil Claims

The purpose of the EAIC's investigation was specifically to determine if foul play or misconduct occurred on the part of the police. Datuk A. Aziz A. Rahim emphasized that the inquiry was not intended to assist any particular lawyer or legal firm in pursuing civil claims arising from Syed Mohd Azlan's death. The commission's mandate focused on the conduct of law enforcement agencies during their investigations.
Foul Play Findings Led to Prosecution Recommendation

Based on its findings, the EAIC concluded that foul play was involved on the part of the police. Consequently, the commission recommended criminal prosecution against the police personnel implicated in the incident. This recommendation stems directly from the evidence gathered during the investigation into the circumstances surrounding Syed Mohd Azlan's death.
Witness Lists Are Not Subject to Disclosure

The EAIC also addressed a request for detailed witness lists from the investigation. The commission clarified that it is under no obligation to release or disclose such specific details from the inquiry. This stance aligns with the nature of such investigations, where the focus remains on the findings and recommendations rather than the full disclosure of all investigatory materials.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did EAIC deny claims its report was classified secret?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends