Why did JMBs distance themselves from developers after temple riots?

Question

Accepted Answer

Joint Management Bodies Deny Association with Temple Developers Following Riots

The Joint Management Bodies (JMBs) of three property projects in Subang Jaya have explicitly stated they have no affiliation with One City Development Sdn Bhd and MCT Berhad, the entities involved with the land where recent temple riots occurred. This clarification comes after demonstrators mistakenly associated the JMBs' properties with the developers and owners of the temple land, leading to vandalism and arson against the JMBs' assets. The JMBs sought to distance themselves to correct this misunderstanding and protect their constituents' interests.
Misdirected Demonstrations and Property Damage

During the unrest that erupted earlier in the week at the Sri Maha Mariamman Devastanam temple, the JMBs of SkyPark, The Place, and The Square experienced significant damage. Their properties were vandalised, and several vehicles belonging to their members were set ablaze. A spokesperson for the JMBs indicated that the demonstrators' actions stemmed from a mistaken belief that these commercial properties were directly linked to the parties responsible for the temple land's development and ownership.
Clarification of Ownership and Management Structure

The JMBs emphasised that their managed properties, including the office tower and units within One City, USJ 25, are collectively owned by 939 individual owners. These owners are represented by the respective JMBs, which are responsible for the day-to-day management of the buildings and common areas. This structure highlights that the JMBs and their constituents are distinct from the entities involved in the temple dispute.
Distinguishing Tenants from Owners

Further clarifying the situation, the JMBs pointed out that One City Development Sdn Bhd and MCT Berhad are tenants within the One City development, rather than owners of the individual units or the broader property. This distinction is crucial in understanding why the JMBs felt compelled to issue a statement distancing themselves; their operational and ownership structures are separate from those associated with the temple land, despite the proximity of the developments. The extent of the damage to the JMBs' properties and vehicles is still being assessed but is understood to be substantial.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did JMBs distance themselves from developers after temple riots?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends