Why did Malpass initially refuse to confirm climate consensus?

Question

Accepted Answer

Malpass's Initial Hesitation on Climate Consensus Stemmed from a Lack of Direct Scientific Expertise and Broader World Bank Policy Considerations

World Bank President David Malpass initially demurred when asked about his belief in the scientific consensus on climate change, stating he was "not a scientist." This hesitation occurred during a public event where he was pressed on whether he accepted that the burning of fossil fuels is warming the planet. While Malpass later clarified his position, asserting that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are causing climate change, his initial reluctance drew significant criticism from climate advocates who renewed calls for his replacement.
Public Statement and Clarification

During a New York Times climate finance panel earlier this week, Malpass was repeatedly questioned about his views on man-made climate change. His initial response was to attempt to evade the question, before stating, "I don't even know. I'm not a scientist." This statement led to widespread scrutiny and calls for his resignation. Subsequently, Malpass sought to clarify his stance in a note to World Bank staff and an interview with CNN International, where he stated, "It's clear that greenhouse gas emissions are coming from manmade sources, including fossil fuels, methane, the agricultural uses, the industrial uses, so we're working hard to change that." He also acknowledged that viewing the situation "in a different light is incorrect and regrettable."
Renewed Criticism and World Bank's Fossil Fuel Stance

Malpass's remarks intensified existing criticism from climate advocates who have long been concerned about the World Bank's approach to fossil fuel financing. Despite reducing new coal power investments in 2013 and ceasing funding for upstream oil and gas operations in 2019, the institution has resisted pressure to entirely phase out fossil fuel financing. For instance, the World Bank's board approved a US$620 million investment in a liquefied natural gas project in Mozambique in January of the previous year, which drew considerable criticism from climate activists.
Broader Implications and Calls for Replacement

The controversy surrounding Malpass's comments has raised concerns among various stakeholders. US lawmaker Maxine Waters, head of the House of Representatives' financial services committee, suggested that Malpass's remarks call into question the World Bank's commitment to addressing climate change, potentially threatening the bank's relevance in other critical areas like poverty alleviation and sustainable growth. A spokesperson for Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland also emphasized the World Bank's crucial role in climate action, stating that its leadership must fully support global climate initiatives. These reactions highlight the significant public and political pressure on the World Bank to align its policies and leadership with global climate action efforts.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did Malpass initially refuse to confirm climate consensus?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends