Why did Negeri Sembilan DKU secretary reject his suspension?

Question

Accepted Answer

Negeri Sembilan DKU Secretary Rejects Suspension Citing Lack of Legal Effect and Usurpation of Ruler's Powers

Negeri Sembilan Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU) secretary Raja Norazli Raja Nordin has rejected his indefinite suspension, asserting that the action by several ruling chiefs is legally void. Raja Norazli stated that his appointment was made by the Yang di-Pertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, and he remains bound to his duties unless directly instructed otherwise by the state ruler. He further contended that the attempt to suspend him constitutes an affront aimed at usurping the constitutional authority of the state ruler, rendering the suspension without legal standing.
Grounds for Rejection by Raja Norazli

Raja Norazli communicated his rejection in a letter addressed to the Undang of Jelebu, Undang of Johol, Undang of Rembau, Tunku Besar Tampin, Datuk Shahbandar Sungei Ujong, and Datuk Mubarak Dohak. He maintained that his position and responsibilities are directly tied to the state ruler, Tuanku Muhriz, and any directive contrary to the ruler's will is invalid. This stance underscores his belief that the ruling chiefs overstepped their constitutional boundaries by attempting to suspend him.
Accusations Leading to Suspension

The suspension was announced on May 29 by the aforementioned six ruling chiefs, who accused Raja Norazli of failing to convene a special DKU meeting. The purpose of the proposed meeting was to address the ongoing royal and adat (customary law) crisis within the state. These chiefs claimed to have the support of six out of the eight DKU members and proposed an interim committee to manage the secretary's duties.
Procedural and Legal Objections to the Meeting

Raja Norazli raised significant procedural objections to the proposed meeting and, by extension, the validity of the suspension. He argued that the DKU cannot be properly constituted without the presence of Yang di-Pertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz, who was absent during the May 29 meeting where the suspension was announced. Furthermore, Raja Norazli cited that holding such a meeting could potentially prejudice ongoing court proceedings, as the six ruling chiefs themselves had previously filed an originating summons against him, the DKU, and the state government.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did Negeri Sembilan DKU secretary reject his suspension?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

3

0

0

Share with friends