Why did PIS record the most deposit failures at 72?

Question

Accepted Answer

Parti Impian Sabah Recorded the Highest Number of Deposit Failures

Parti Impian Sabah (PIS) had the highest number of candidates lose their deposits in the 17th Sabah State Election, with 72 individuals failing to secure at least one-eighth of the total votes cast in their respective constituencies. This outcome means these candidates forfeited their election deposit, a sum intended to deter frivolous candidacies. The specific reasons for PIS's extensive deposit failures are not detailed in the provided information, but generally, such results can stem from a combination of factors affecting a party's electoral performance.
High Number of Candidates Contesting

The sheer volume of candidates fielded by PIS likely contributed to the overall number of deposit failures. With a significant number of hopefuls across various seats, the statistical probability of a portion of them not meeting the vote threshold increases. For instance, the article notes that 72 PIS candidates lost their deposits, which represents the largest single-party figure.
Individual Candidate Performance

The performance of individual candidates is a direct determinant of whether their deposit is retained. In the case of PIS president Michel Alok @ Ilok, he contested the Telupid seat and secured only 291 votes, well below the required threshold. Similarly, other candidates from various parties, including Parti Rumpun Sabah president Datuk Dr Ismail Idris and former Minister Datuk Mohamaddin Ketapi, also experienced deposit loss due to insufficient vote tallies in their contests.
General Electoral Trends and Support Levels

The data indicates a broader trend of deposit forfeitures across multiple parties and independent candidates. PIS's 72 failures were followed by independent candidates (60), and then parties like Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR Sabah) and Perikatan Nasional (PN), each with 36. This suggests that a substantial number of candidates across the political spectrum struggled to gain enough traction to retain their deposits, pointing to a general challenge in mobilizing sufficient voter support in many constituencies.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did PIS record the most deposit failures at 72?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends