Why did Russia and China veto the US-led UN ceasefire resolution?

Question

Accepted Answer

Russia and China Vetoed US-Led UN Ceasefire Resolution Due to Objections Over Content and Political Motivations

Russia and China vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution, proposed by the United States, which called for an immediate and sustained ceasefire in Gaza lasting approximately six weeks. The primary reasons cited for the vetoes included objections to the resolution's perceived politicization, its perceived lack of clear opposition to a planned Israeli military operation in Rafah, and accusations from the US that the vetoes were driven by cynical and petty political considerations rather than genuine concern for peace.
Objections to the Resolution's Wording and Implications

Russia's UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia stated that the US-led resolution was "exceedingly politicized" and effectively provided a green light for Israel to conduct a military operation in Rafah. He warned that such an operation would lead to the destruction, devastation, or expulsion of Gaza's entire population. Similarly, China's UN Ambassador Zhang Jun criticized the text for not clearly articulating opposition to Israel's planned military operation in Rafah, highlighting the potential for severe consequences.
Accusations of Politically Motivated Vetoes

US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield accused Russia and China of vetoing the resolution for "cynical" and "petty" reasons. She suggested that their opposition stemmed simply from the fact that the resolution was drafted by the United States. Thomas-Greenfield also criticized both countries for failing to condemn Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel and asserted that their actions did not contribute meaningfully to advancing peace or the humanitarian response efforts.
Alternative Resolutions and Diplomatic Efforts

The Security Council had previously seen eleven members vote in favour of the US resolution, with Algeria voting no and Guyana abstaining, but the vetoes prevented its passage. Following this, an alternative resolution drafted by elected members of the Security Council, demanding an immediate ceasefire for the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, the release of all hostages, and an expanded flow of humanitarian assistance, was scheduled for a vote. However, the US expressed concerns that this alternative draft, in its current form, could undermine sensitive regional diplomacy and potentially give Hamas an excuse to withdraw from ongoing deal negotiations. France, along with Jordan and the United Arab Emirates, also indicated a willingness to work towards persuading Russia and China to support yet another alternative resolution.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did Russia and China veto the US-led UN ceasefire resolution?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends