Why did the nanny choose not to have her mobile phone during supervision?

Question

Accepted Answer

Nanny's Mobile Phone Use During Child Supervision Clarified

The nanny intentionally did not have her mobile phone with her while supervising the three-year-old boy to ensure she could fully concentrate on the child's safety. This decision was made to maintain undivided attention during their time at the condominium playground on March 5, 2025.
Focus on Supervision

The nanny's absence of a mobile phone stemmed from a desire to dedicate her complete attention to supervising the child. She had brought the boy to the playground around 6pm, and her decision regarding the phone was a deliberate choice to prioritize the child's immediate oversight.
Lack of Phone Amidst Incident

Despite her intention to focus, court proceedings revealed a 46-second gap in supervision, during which the child moved towards the pool area unsupervised. While the nanny was not using her phone, this brief period of unobserved activity preceded the child's accidental fall into the 1.2m-deep pool.
Coroner's Observations on Conduct

Coroner Brenda Chua noted that the nanny was not forthcoming during the inquiry, describing her conduct as "one of deflection." The coroner also highlighted the critical importance of close supervision for young children, particularly in proximity to swimming pools, in the wake of the accidental drowning.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the nanny choose not to have her mobile phone during supervision?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends