Why did the High Court rule against Rosmah in the RM67.5 million jewellery case?

Question

Accepted Answer

High Court Ruled Against Rosmah Due to Failure to Account for Missing Luxury Jewellery

The High Court ruled against Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor in the RM67.5 million jewellery case because she failed to account for 43 missing pieces of luxury jewellery supplied on a consignment basis. The court found her liable for not returning the items, which were valued at US$14.57 million when delivered in 2018. Rosmah's defence, claiming the jewellery was seized during a 2018 police raid, was not proven to the court's satisfaction.
Failure to Return Consigned Jewellery

Lebanese jeweller Samer Halimeh, representing Global Royalty Trading SAL, supplied 44 pieces of luxury jewellery to Rosmah in 2018 under a consignment arrangement for her to view. The High Court determined that Rosmah received these items but neither purchased nor paid for them. Crucially, she failed to return 43 of these pieces to the company.
Unsubstantiated Defence Regarding Seizure

Rosmah contended that the jewellery had been confiscated during a police raid conducted in 2018, an event linked to investigations concerning her husband, former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak. However, the High Court found that she did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate this claim. The court concluded that Rosmah could not account for the whereabouts of the missing 43 pieces of jewellery.
Limited Recovery of Items

The legal dispute involved a substantial collection of luxury jewellery. Following the consignment arrangement, only one item, identified as a diamond and emerald bracelet, was eventually recovered and returned to the Lebanese company. This recovery occurred after separate forfeiture proceedings, highlighting the significant loss of the majority of the consignment.
Lengthy Legal Battle and Vindication

The High Court's decision marks the culmination of an eight-year legal battle initiated by Samer Halimeh. Halimeh expressed a sense of vindication following the ruling, stating that the Malaysian courts had demonstrated their independence. He noted that the case had faced numerous challenges, including attempts to discredit his claim and allegations that the company and the claim were fabricated.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the High Court rule against Rosmah in the RM67.5 million jewellery case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends