Why did the Palace rebuke the de facto law minister?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Palace Rebuke Followed the Law Minister's Announcement of Emergency Ordinance Revocation Without Royal Consent

The Palace issued a rare rebuke to the de facto law minister following his announcement that the Emergency Ordinances had been revoked on July 21. The statement from Istana Negara indicated that this decision was made without the consent of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah. This royal disapproval highlights a significant constitutional disagreement regarding the process for revoking ordinances declared under a state of emergency.
Announcement of Ordinance Revocation

De facto law minister Takiyuddin Hassan stated on Monday that the Emergency Ordinances had been revoked on July 21. This announcement suggested a formal end to the legal measures enacted under the nationwide state of Emergency, which was initially declared in January by the King due to a sharp rise in Covid-19 cases. The timing of this declaration was particularly notable as the intended revocation date of August 1 approached.
Royal Disagreement on Consent

The Palace, in a subsequent statement, clarified that the decision to revoke the Emergency Ordinances was made without the consent of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. This assertion by Istana Negara signifies a divergence between the executive branch's actions and the King's prerogative, as the royal assent is typically required for such significant legal and constitutional changes. The rebuke underscores the importance of the King's involvement in decisions pertaining to the state of Emergency.
Context of Rising Covid-19 Cases

The announcement of the Emergency Ordinances' revocation came at a time when Malaysia was experiencing a surge in Covid-19 infections, reaching new daily highs of around 17,000 cases. This situation presented a complex backdrop for the executive's decision, as the state of Emergency had been instituted to manage the pandemic. The ongoing public health crisis and the King's role in declaring the emergency provide essential context for the subsequent disagreement over the ordinances' revocation.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the Palace rebuke the de facto law minister?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends