Why did the US deny visas to former EU commissioner Breton and four others?

Question

Accepted Answer

US Denies Visas to Former EU Commissioner and Four Activists Over Allegations of Coercing Social Media Censorship

The US State Department has denied visas to former EU commissioner Thierry Breton and four other individuals, citing their alleged efforts to compel American social media platforms to censor viewpoints they oppose. The department characterized these individuals as "radical activists and weaponised NGOs" who facilitated censorship crackdowns by foreign governments, specifically targeting American speakers and companies.
Allegations of Coercion and Censorship

The State Department's statement articulated that the individuals targeted by the visa ban were actively involved in advancing censorship initiatives by foreign states. These actions, according to the department, specifically impacted American speakers and businesses operating within the digital space. The implication is that these individuals used their influence and positions to pressure social media companies into removing or restricting content that did not align with their agendas, thereby infringing upon freedom of expression and targeting US entities.
Role in European Digital Services Act

Thierry Breton, identified as the "mastermind" behind the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA), played a significant role in shaping this landmark legislation. The DSA mandates that major social media platforms adhere to specific content moderation standards and other regulations when operating within Europe. This legislation has been a point of contention, with some US conservatives viewing it as a tool for censorship against right-wing viewpoints, an assertion vehemently denied by the EU. The DSA requires platforms to provide transparency regarding content moderation decisions, ensure user understanding, and facilitate research into issues like child exposure to harmful content.
Other Individuals Targeted

Beyond Thierry Breton, the visa ban also encompassed several other prominent figures. These include Imran Ahmed, associated with the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, an organisation focused on combating online hate and misinformation, which had previously come under scrutiny from Elon Musk following his acquisition of Twitter. Additionally, Anna-Lena von Hodenberg and Josephine Ballon of HateAid, a German entity described by the State Department as a trusted flagger for DSA enforcement, were also subjected to the ban. Clare Melford, the head of the UK-based Global Disinformation Index (GDI), which also focuses on issues related to disinformation, completed the list of individuals barred from entering the US.
Broader Context of Tech Regulation Disputes

This visa action occurs within a broader context of escalating disputes between the US and European entities over technology regulation. Washington has intensified its criticism of EU regulations, particularly following recent actions such as Brussels fining X (formerly Twitter) for non-compliance with DSA rules on advertising transparency and user verification. The US government has also indicated potential retaliatory measures against key European businesses. Furthermore, the US has expressed opposition to the UK's Online Safety Act, a piece of legislation similar to the DSA, leading to the suspension of a tech cooperation deal with Britain. These moves underscore a widening divergence in approaches to governing online content and platform responsibilities.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the US deny visas to former EU commissioner Breton and four others?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends