Why did the MMA strongly oppose the new ministerial order?

Question

Accepted Answer

MMA Opposes New Ministerial Order Due to Double Standards and Lack of Scientific Basis

The Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) strongly opposes the recent ministerial order that reduces the observation or home surveillance period for cabinet ministers returning from official overseas visits to just three days. The MMA argues that this policy creates a clear double standard compared to the general public and questions whether the decision is supported by scientific evidence. They are calling for the immediate revocation of this new order.
Concerns Over Double Standards

The MMA highlights that the new order, which allows ministers a significantly shorter observation period of three days, creates a perception of preferential treatment. This is in contrast to the stricter quarantine protocols that the general public is expected to follow. The association emphasizes that for the government to expect citizens to adhere strictly to standard operating procedures (SOPs), it must demonstrate leadership by example and apply the same rules to all individuals, regardless of their position.
Call for Evidence-Based Decisions

A central tenet of the MMA's opposition is the assertion that decisions regarding pandemic management must be grounded in science and evidence. The association is questioning the data that underpins the decision to implement a three-day observation period specifically for ministers. They stress the importance of careful consideration when issuing new orders under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act (Act 342), ensuring that such measures are scientifically justified and demonstrably effective in controlling the spread of infectious diseases.
Demand for Immediate Revocation

Given their strong objections, the MMA is urging the government to immediately revoke the new ministerial order. They believe that maintaining such a policy undermines public trust and the collective effort required to manage the ongoing pandemic. The association advocates for a consistent approach to quarantine and observation periods, applying the same stringent measures to everyone to ensure fairness and uphold the integrity of public health protocols.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the MMA strongly oppose the new ministerial order?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends