Why did the AG deem the RM2.6b explanation insufficient?

Question

Accepted Answer

Insufficient Explanation Provided for Closure of RM2.6 Billion Case

Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan has stated that the Attorney-General's (AG) explanation for closing the case involving RM2.6 billion deposited into Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's accounts was insufficient. She believes the public is entitled to further details, particularly regarding how the presumption of corruption, typically associated with large donations, was displaced in this instance. Ambiga also raised concerns about the AG's disclosure of the donation's return to donors, a fact not previously mentioned.
Public Entitlement to Further Details

Ambiga articulated that the public has a right to more comprehensive information concerning the RM2.6 billion deposit case, emphasizing its status as a matter of public interest. She expressed that the explanation provided by the AG and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) lacks the clarity needed for public understanding. The assertion is that any explanation must be logical and demonstrably sound, which, in her view, the current one is not.
Questioning the Displacement of Corruption Presumption

A key point of contention for Ambiga is the AG's handling of the presumption of corruption, which generally arises when significant donations are involved. She questioned how this presumption was nullified in the prime minister's case, suggesting that such substantial sums are rarely given without an expectation of something in return. This perspective implies that without overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the public will remain skeptical.
Lack of Prior Disclosure on Donation Return

Furthermore, Ambiga highlighted the AG's recent revelation that a portion of the donation was returned to the donors. She pointed out that this specific detail had not been communicated previously, raising questions about the completeness of earlier disclosures. The argument is that authorities should not use confidentiality as a reason to withhold information that could adequately explain a decision not to press charges.
AG's Stated Facts on Donation and Return

Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali had previously announced the instruction to close cases related to SRC International Sdn Bhd and the RM2.6 billion sum. He stated his satisfaction that the prime minister had not committed any criminal offence based on evidence presented by the MACC. Apandi detailed that US$681 million (RM2.08 billion) was transferred from the Saudi royal family between March and April 2013 as a personal donation without consideration. Investigations, he added, showed that US$620 million (RM2.03 billion) was returned in August of the same year because it was not utilised.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the AG deem the RM2.6b explanation insufficient?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends