Why did the opposition deem debating the report without the PM invalid?

Question

Accepted Answer

Opposition Argued Tabung Haji RCI Report Debate Was Invalid Without Prime Minister

Opposition lawmakers walked out of a special parliamentary sitting concerning the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report on Tabung Haji, asserting that a debate without the Prime Minister would be invalid. Kota Bharu MP Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan articulated this stance, stating that the sitting should have been postponed until the Prime Minister's recovery and return to his official duties. The opposition's departure occurred shortly after the sitting commenced.
Justification for Deferment

Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan, who also serves as the Opposition's chief whip, conveyed that the parliamentary session should be deferred until Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had recuperated and was able to resume his responsibilities. He explicitly stated that proceeding with the debate in the Prime Minister's absence would render the discussion equivalent to a mere press conference, thereby undermining its parliamentary significance.
Prime Minister's Absence

The Prime Minister's absence from the sitting was due to his ongoing physiotherapy treatment. This followed an elective laparoscopic surgery to address a para-umbilical hernia. His medical leave necessitated the opposition's argument for deferring the parliamentary proceedings.
Immediate Walkout

Following the rejection of their request to defer the special sitting, opposition lawmakers immediately exited the Dewan Rakyat. This action underscored their firm position that the integrity of the debate on the Tabung Haji RCI report was compromised without the Prime Minister's presence.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did the opposition deem debating the report without the PM invalid?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends