Why did Zain Amir choose to plead guilty while others pleaded not guilty?

Question

Accepted Answer

Zain Amir Pleaded Guilty to Drug Possession Charge While Others Maintained Innocence

Zain Amir Zainal Khairi, aged 37, entered a guilty plea to an amended drug possession charge, resulting in a fine of RM4,000 or two months' imprisonment in default, a penalty he paid. In contrast, actor Benjy and four other individuals, Imran Radzi, Asmanizam Mohamed Akhir, Norazila Arzami, and Afifi Hamidi, all pleaded not guilty to the same charge. The joint charge involved the possession of 2.99 grams of methamphetamine.
Defense Counsel's Plea for Leniency

Representing Zain Amir, counsel P.G. Cyril requested a lenient sentence from the court. The arguments presented highlighted that Zain Amir has a family to support, possesses no prior criminal record, and had cooperated fully with the police investigation. Furthermore, by pleading guilty, he acknowledged saving the court's time.
Joint Drug Possession Charge Details

The individuals were accused of jointly possessing a bag containing 2.99 grams of methamphetamine. This alleged offence took place at Oakleaf Park Condo, C Block, Persiaran Bukit Jaya, Taman Bukit Jaya, Hulu Kelang, on June 26. The charge falls under Section 12(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which carries a potential jail sentence of up to five years and a fine not exceeding RM100,000.
Amended Charge and Prosecution's Stance

The amended charge was presented by Deputy Public Prosecutor Goh Ai Rene. Previously, the individuals faced a similar charge, but the stated weight of the drug was 4.7 grams. While the defense sought leniency for Zain Amir, the prosecution requested a deterrent sentence for the accused, citing the escalating drug problem.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why did Zain Amir choose to plead guilty while others pleaded not guilty?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends