Why do 122 Malaysian business groups want to abolish the 1953 Entertainments Duty Act?

Question

Accepted Answer

Abolition of 1953 Entertainments Duty Act Sought by 122 Malaysian Business Groups

A coalition of 122 Malaysian business groups, operating under the banner of Industries Unite, is advocating for the complete repeal of the Entertainments Duty Act 1953. They argue that this colonial-era legislation is outdated and no longer relevant to Malaysia's current economic landscape, where entertainment is seen as a vital contributor to tourism, culture, and the creative economy, rather than a luxury. The group contends that the Act imposes a significant burden on various sectors, hinders domestic touring, and creates an uneven playing field compared to digital platforms.
Outdated Legislation Hindering Modern Industries

Industries Unite asserts that the Entertainments Duty Act 1953, originally enacted to tax luxury commercial amusements during the colonial period, fails to reflect the contemporary role of entertainment in Malaysia. Instead of being a luxury, entertainment is now considered a critical driver of tourism, culture, and the creative economy. The Act's punitive measures, such as imposing a 25% tax based on total venue capacity rather than actual sales, negatively impact the cash flow of organisers, particularly affecting grassroots performers, local venues, and independent promoters involved in all ticketed live performances.
Fragmented Regulations and Disparities Across Sectors

The current regulatory environment under the Act is characterised by fragmentation across different states, creating significant hurdles for domestic touring. Artists and promoters face a patchwork of varying tax rates, approval processes, and administrative interpretations, making it difficult to plan and execute tours consistently. Furthermore, a stark disparity exists between traditional cinemas, which face entertainment tax levies of up to 25%, and digital streaming platforms, which currently pay no such tax. Theme parks and shopping malls also argue that the Act, designed for "adult vices," is now unfairly applied to family-friendly recreational activities.
Economic Benefits of Abolition and Precedents

Industries Unite projects substantial economic benefits from the abolition of the Entertainments Duty Act. Their economic modeling suggests that complete removal of the tax could double public attendance and lead to a 150% growth in tax revenues within two years, while also allowing for lower ticket prices. The group points to the Federal Territories' tax exemption for international shows until 2028 as evidence of how stable policy can foster growth, attract investment, and generate economic activity across related sectors like hotels, retail, and transport. Historical data from a 2001 tax cut showed a 13% average annual growth in Gross Box Office and the addition of over 1,200 cinema screens nationwide by 2019.
Call for Unified Policy and Federal-State Collaboration

The coalition is advocating for a unified policy approach and calls for closer cooperation between federal and state governments to establish a clear roadmap towards the total abolition of the Entertainments Duty Act 1953. They highlight that the recent tax reduction in the Federal Territories led to a positive 3% shift in the capital's box office metrics and the addition of 30 new cinema screens. In contrast, cinemas outside the capital, still subject to legacy tax rates, experienced an 18% decline and lost 32 screens. For shopping malls, eliminating the tax would enable them to generate stronger economic returns through increased visitor spending and enhanced tourism appeal, further empowering them as hubs for leisure and recreation.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why do 122 Malaysian business groups want to abolish the 1953 Entertainments Duty Act?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends