Why do DAP delegates favour staying in the unity government until the term ends?

Question

Accepted Answer

DAP Delegates Largely Support Remaining in Unity Government Until Term Ends

A significant portion of delegates at the DAP national congress have voiced strong support for the party to remain within the federal unity government until the conclusion of its current term. This stance is primarily driven by the conviction that withdrawing prematurely would be tantamount to abandoning voters, ceding political ground to rival parties, and betraying the party's core principles and ongoing struggle for reform. Delegates also highlighted the importance of maintaining political stability and continuing the progress initiated under the current administration.
Avoiding Abandonment of Voters and Political Opportunism

Several delegates articulated that leaving the unity government before its term concludes would represent a dereliction of duty towards the electorate who placed their trust in DAP. Perak delegate Jason Ng Thien Yeong argued that departing after achieving a victory would be akin to "running away," asserting that the party's place is within the government to actively pursue change. He further questioned the beneficiaries of DAP's withdrawal, suggesting that parties such as MCA, PAS, or Perikatan Nasional might gain a significant political advantage.
Upholding Political Stability and Progress

The imperative of political stability was a recurring theme, with Penang delegate Daniel Gooi Zi Sen referencing the disruptive impact of the 2020 Sheraton Move. Gooi pointed out that major projects faced stagnation during periods of political uncertainty, contrasting this with the ongoing progress on initiatives like the LRT under the present administration. He stressed that the party should not disregard the advancements made by the unity government, despite acknowledging its inherent shortcomings.
Mitigating Political Suicide and Ensuring Party Survival

Concerns about the party's political future were also prominent, with Sarawak delegate Soo Tien Ren describing immediate withdrawal as "political suicide" and an abandonment of Malaysians who believe in DAP. However, Soo also cautioned that remaining in government without demonstrating tangible reforms could prove equally damaging. He advocated for a strategy focused on the party's survival and recovery, suggesting specific reforms such as the Prime Minister relinquishing the Finance portfolio and restoring the Budi95 subsidised petrol scheme to its original 300-litre quota.
Adherence to Principles and Continued Struggle

Kedah delegate Lim Hooi Yee echoed the sentiment of continuing the party's mission, stating that leaving the federal government would signify a betrayal of the King, the people, and DAP's foundational principles. She emphasized that the party's struggle is far from over and that the outcomes of recent state elections should serve as a call for introspection and renewed effort, rather than an excuse to abdicate responsibility. This perspective underscores a commitment to seeing through the party's mandate and objectives.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why do DAP delegates favour staying in the unity government until the term ends?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

3

0

0

Share with friends