Why is Abdul Hadi Awang demanding WSJ produce witnesses?

Question

Accepted Answer

Abdul Hadi Awang's Demand for Witnesses from the Wall Street Journal

Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang has reportedly demanded that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) produce four witnesses to substantiate its report concerning significant cash deposits into the prime minister's private bank accounts, originating from the state-owned 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Hadi is said to have invoked the principle of fair play, suggesting that the newspaper should have presented these witnesses prior to publishing its report which implicated Najib.
Principle of Fair Play and Legal Jurisdiction

The demand from Abdul Hadi Awang is framed around the concept of fair play, asserting that the Wall Street Journal should have presented four trustworthy witnesses before publishing its report. This stance was reportedly extended by Hadi, who stated that his party, PAS, had adopted a similar position during the sodomy trial involving PKR's Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. This invocation of a specific legal or procedural principle highlights Hadi's stated rationale for the demand.
Questioning of Motives Amidst Financial Scandal

Charles Santiago, a Member of Parliament for Klang, has publicly questioned Hadi's motivations behind this demand. Santiago suggested that Hadi's actions might be an attempt to shield Prime Minister Najib Razak at a time when the country is facing a significant financial scandal involving the 1MDB funds. The core of Santiago's concern revolves around whether Hadi's interest lies in ensuring justice or in protecting Najib.
Islamic Law and Transparency in Reporting

Santiago further raised questions regarding Hadi's references to Islamic law in the context of the WSJ report. He questioned how one could convince Hadi that the newspaper's reporting is not subject to shariah law, implying a disconnect between Hadi's legal framework and standard journalistic practices. Santiago indicated that transparency is essential for justice to be served in matters of public interest, suggesting that Hadi's position potentially obstructs this.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why is Abdul Hadi Awang demanding WSJ produce witnesses?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends