Why is strengthening existing institutions preferred over new agencies?

Question

Accepted Answer

Strengthening Existing Institutions is Preferred Over Establishing New Agencies to Accelerate Policy Implementation

The government's decision to prioritise strengthening existing institutions over creating new Bumiputera agencies is driven by a strategic aim to accelerate policy implementation and prevent functional overlap. This approach underscores a shift from the traditional method of agency creation to a more integrated model where all ministries, government agencies, and government-linked companies are collectively responsible for the Bumiputera empowerment agenda. The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, articulated that continuing with outdated methods while expecting improved outcomes is ineffective.
Preventing Overlapping Functions and Enhancing Efficiency

A key rationale for reinforcing current institutions is to avoid the duplication of efforts and responsibilities that often arises with the establishment of new bodies. By focusing resources and mandates on existing agencies, the government seeks to streamline operations and ensure clearer lines of accountability. This integrated approach aims to make the implementation of policies more efficient and impactful, as outlined in the Prime Minister's remarks regarding the Bumiputera Economic Transformation Plan 2035 (PuTERA35).
National Priority and Shared Responsibility

The Bumiputera empowerment agenda is now framed as a national priority, rather than the exclusive domain of specific agencies. This means that all arms of the government, including ministries and government-linked companies, are expected to align their policies and programmes to contribute to this objective. This collective responsibility is intended to ensure a more comprehensive and coordinated execution of the agenda across the nation.
Embracing a New Approach to Policy Execution

The government acknowledges that the previous modus operandi, focused on establishing new entities for specific goals, is no longer deemed sufficient for achieving desired results. Consequently, the preference is to enhance the capabilities and effectiveness of the institutions already in place. This strategic pivot is designed to foster a more dynamic and responsive policy environment, moving away from what is perceived as an ineffective, traditional approach.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why is strengthening existing institutions preferred over new agencies?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends