Why is the PM personally hesitant to appeal the ruling?

Question

Accepted Answer

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim Expresses Personal Hesitancy to Appeal Sabah Revenue Ruling, Awaiting Legal Advice

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has indicated a personal inclination to avoid appealing the High Court's decision affirming Sabah's right to 40 per cent of federal revenue collected within the state. While acknowledging that High Court judgments with perceived weaknesses are typically subject to appeal, he suggested that the specific nature of this case, involving ongoing negotiations, might allow for a different approach. A final decision on whether to appeal will be made by the federal government after consulting with the Attorney General's Chambers and further Cabinet discussions.
Consideration of Negotiation Dynamics

Anwar Ibrahim noted that the High Court's ruling, received only three days prior, contains both strengths and weaknesses. He highlighted that the case involves negotiations, a factor that might create flexibility regarding an appeal. This suggests a nuanced view where the potential for constructive dialogue with Sabah could influence the federal government's legal strategy, moving beyond a standard appeal process.
Commitment to Malaysia Agreement 1963

The Prime Minister reiterated his administration's commitment to implementing the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), describing the current government's approach as "stronger and more secure." This statement frames the decision-making process within the broader context of federal-state relations and historical commitments to Sabah, implying that any action taken will be consistent with strengthening these ties.
Respect for Legal Processes and Constitutional Framework

Anwar Ibrahim emphasised the importance of adhering to proper legal procedures and respecting the Federal Constitution. He stressed the need to listen to and understand Sabah's concerns while ensuring that all actions are constitutionally sound. This underscores a commitment to a deliberative process that balances legal obligations with the specific historical and constitutional rights of Sabah.
High Court Ruling on Revenue Entitlement

The Kota Kinabalu High Court's decision on October 17 found the federal government's failure to fulfill Sabah's entitlement to 40 per cent of federal revenue for approximately five decades to be unlawful. The court declared the existing special grant arrangement "invalid, ultra vires, and irrational," and in breach of the Constitution. It mandated a revenue review under Article 112D of the Federal Constitution to reinstate Sabah's entitlement for the period between 1974 and 2021, with specific timelines set for the review and agreement.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why is the PM personally hesitant to appeal the ruling?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends