Why is the declaration to remove the ruler deemed invalid and unacceptable?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Declaration to Remove the Ruler Was Deemed Invalid Due to Lack of Authority and Constitutional Inconsistency

The declaration to remove the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, was deemed invalid and unacceptable primarily because the individual who made the declaration, Datuk Mubarak Dohak, no longer possessed the authority as Undang Luak Sungai Ujong. Furthermore, the act itself was found to be inconsistent with the established constitutional framework of Negeri Sembilan.
Mubarak Dohak Lacked Authority to Make the Declaration

Datuk Mubarak Dohak's declaration to remove Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir was explicitly stated to be invalid because Mubarak no longer held the position and associated authority of Undang Luak Sungai Ujong. The Undang Luak are traditional chiefs within Negeri Sembilan who hold significant customary power and responsibility, particularly in matters concerning the selection and installation of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar. Their authority is deeply rooted in the state's adat, or customary law, and is governed by specific constitutional provisions. Without the legitimate standing of Undang Luak Sungai Ujong, any declaration made by Mubarak regarding the removal of the state's ruler would inherently lack legal and customary force.
The Declaration Contravened Negeri Sembilan's Constitutional Provisions

Beyond the issue of personal authority, the declaration was also deemed unacceptable as it was inconsistent with Articles 10 to 12 of the Negeri Sembilan Constitution (UUTKNS) 1959. These articles, within the framework of the state's unique constitutional monarchy, outline the established procedures and customary affairs ('adat') pertaining to the succession and powers of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar. The Negeri Sembilan Constitution, also known as the Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan, is the supreme law of the state and dictates the functions and limitations of its highest institutions. Any action that bypasses or contradicts these constitutional articles, particularly those concerning the highest office in the state, is considered unconstitutional and therefore invalid.
Adat and Constitutional Law Govern the Ruler's Position

The structure of governance in Negeri Sembilan is deeply intertwined with its unique system of adat. The Yang di-Pertuan Besar is the head of state, but their position and the process of succession are significantly influenced by the Undang Luak. The Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan 1959 codifies many of these customary practices into constitutional law, establishing a dual system where both adat and formal legal statutes define the state's political landscape. The declaration's invalidity stems from its failure to adhere to the established protocols that balance customary rights with constitutional mandates, as reinforced by the federal government's stance of non-interference in such adat matters.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why is the declaration to remove the ruler deemed invalid and unacceptable?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends