Why was bail not offered for the Prophet Muhammad insult charge?

Question

Accepted Answer

Bail Was Not Offered Due to the Non-Bailable Nature of the Offence

Bail was not offered for the charge of insulting Prophet Muhammad PBUH because the offence itself is classified as non-bailable under Malaysian law. The accused, a 22-year-old factory operator identified as A. Taneson, faced this charge in the Magistrate’s Court in Shah Alam.
Specific Legal Provision Cited

The charge against Taneson was brought under Section 298A (1) of the Penal Code. This section specifically addresses acts that cause disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred, and ill-will on religious grounds among the diverse population of the country. Such a charge carries a potential penalty of up to five years imprisonment upon conviction.
Prosecution's Stance on Bail

During the court proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Fairuz Johari indicated that bail would not be offered. This decision was directly based on the classification of the charge as a non-bailable offence, a standard legal procedure in such cases.
Court's Bail Decision Amidst Defence Plea

Despite the prosecution's recommendation against bail, Taneson's defence counsel requested it, citing the accused's alleged mental health issues and a need for hospital observation. Ultimately, the Magistrate, Rini Triany Muhamad Ali, set bail at RM8,000 with one surety. As part of the bail conditions, Taneson is required to report to the nearest police station every two weeks. The court has scheduled April 5 for the next mention of the case.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why was bail not offered for the Prophet Muhammad insult charge?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends