Why was Nasharudin Mat Isa deemed unsuitable to lead the GMMF?

Question

Accepted Answer

Nasharudin Mat Isa Was Deemed Unsuitable to Lead the GMMF Due to Contradictory Leanings and Inaction

The G25 group stated that Datuk Nasharudin Mat Isa was an unsuitable choice to lead the Global Movement of Moderates Foundation (GMMF) because his conservative affiliations and past actions contradicted the foundation's core mission of promoting moderation. The position, they argued, requires an individual who embodies compassion and possesses strong engagement skills with both governmental bodies and civil society, qualities they felt Nasharudin lacked. Furthermore, his expected role of denouncing the excesses of the previous administration was undermined by his reliance on conservative groups.
Conservative Affiliations Contradicted Moderation Policy

Nasharudin was widely known to depend on the support of conservative entities, including Jakim and other religious authorities. These groups are characterised by practices of exclusivity and intolerance, which directly conflict with the fundamental policy of moderation that the GMMF was established to champion. This reliance on such factions created a perception that Nasharudin’s leadership would not genuinely advance the cause of moderation.
Failure to Censure Authorities on Key Issues

The GMMF, under Nasharudin's leadership, notably failed to take action on significant issues that directly opposed the principles of moderation. For instance, the foundation did not censure authorities for the detention of Muslim scholar Mustafa Akyol, who was reportedly apprehended for preaching without the necessary credentials. Additionally, the GMMF remained silent on the Home Ministry's decision to ban the G25’s book, Breaking the Silence, a publication intended to foster moderation in Islam and reconcile Islamic jurisprudence with Malaysia's Federal Constitution.
Inconsistency with the "New Malaysia" Aspirations

The G25 group explicitly stated that Nasharudin was out of step with the aspirations and policies of the new administration in Malaysia. They suggested that his leadership was inconsistent with the government's commitment to moderation and tolerance. The G25 further proposed that the GMMF itself should be dissolved, with its functions potentially absorbed by the Foreign Ministry in partnership with local civil society groups and activists, indicating a broader dissatisfaction with the foundation's existing structure and leadership.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why was Nasharudin Mat Isa deemed unsuitable to lead the GMMF?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends