Why was the Chinese national not prevented from leaving Malaysia?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Chinese national was not prevented from leaving Malaysia because she was not considered a suspect in the ongoing investigation.

The Chinese national involved in the commotion at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) and her companion, who had entered Malaysia as tourists, were permitted to depart the country. This was explicitly stated as they were not classified as suspects in relation to the incident. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has been investigating allegations of bribe solicitation to resolve issues concerning individuals failing to meet immigration entry requirements.
MACC Investigation into Alleged Bribery

The MACC has identified an individual suspected of acting as an agent to solicit bribes, reportedly amounting to RM18,000, in an effort to resolve the case of the Chinese national. This agent is believed to be a foreigner, as indicated by their use of a foreign language and the messaging application WeChat. The investigation is also examining a company operating at the airport, which is authorised to handle individuals issued a “Not To Land” notice. This company, reportedly operational since 2017 and appointed by Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB), will be investigated for the legitimacy of funds received, particularly whether they involved bribes.
Role of Airport Company and MAHB

A company operating within KLIA is permitted to manage individuals who have received a “Not To Land” notice. This specific company, which has been in operation since 2017, was appointed by MAHB. Consequently, MAHB will also be subject to questioning regarding its regulations for such appointed companies, as KLIA falls under its purview. While Immigration holds enforcement authority at the airport, other agencies like Customs are also present.
Allegations of Corruption and Abuse of Power

The incident gained prominence following claims by the Minister of Tourism, Arts and Culture, Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing, who alleged a widespread "culture of corruption" among Immigration staff at KLIA Terminal 1. These claims followed an accusation that he had abused his power to enter the arrival hall to assist a visitor from China who had been denied entry. The minister further alleged that Immigration officers demanded payments of RM3,000 for the release of detained travellers, with an additional RM3,000 required for immediate repatriation. The MACC has recorded at least 14 statements concerning the incident, including those from eight Immigration Department officers.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why was the Chinese national not prevented from leaving Malaysia?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends