Why were P and C rejected under Article 15A without reasons given?

Question

Accepted Answer

P and C were rejected under Article 15A because the Home Minister dismissed their applications without providing any stated reasons

P and C applied for Malaysian citizenship under Article 15A at the end of October 2018, and their applications were refused about a month later. The rejection was communicated as “rejected without reasons given,” and no specific grounds for the decision were disclosed in the account. Under Article 15A, citizenship applications are made to the Home Minister, who decides on such bids.
P and C applied under Article 15A at the end of October 2018, then received a refusal about a month later
P and C’s citizenship requests were submitted at the end of October 2018 under Article 15A. Their applications were refused roughly a month afterward, with the outcome described as rejection without any reasons provided.
The refusal letter or decision did not disclose any specific grounds
The lawyers’ description is that the rejection came without reasons given. Because no stated basis was provided for why P and C were turned down, the record does not identify any particular substantive criterion or factual issue that led to the refusal.
The decision authority for Article 15A applications is the Home Minister
Article 15A is the constitutional route that allows registration of a person aged below 21 as a citizen in “such special circumstances as it thinks fit,” with the Home Minister handling the citizenship bid. In practice, the process runs through the ministry and the Home Minister’s decision-making, but the cited account does not specify what the Home Minister relied on for P and C.
Lawyers chose to pursue appeals rather than resubmitting because no reasons were provided
Lawyer Raymond Mah said that, generally, the ministry would advise applicants to resubmit a fresh application. However, because no reasons were given for P and C’s rejection, the lawyers stated they would not resubmit and would instead proceed with the hearing of their appeals.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Why were P and C rejected under Article 15A without reasons given?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends