Will MIC and PAS leaders meet to discuss hudud law?

Question

Accepted Answer

MIC Seeks Dialogue with PAS on Hudud Law Implementation

The Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) has expressed its intention not to support the implementation of hudud law and is actively seeking a meeting with the PAS leadership to discuss these concerns. A formal request has been made to PAS deputy president YB Mohamad Sabu, who has subsequently forwarded it to the party secretary-general, Dato Mustaffa Ali, to arrange a discussion. The core of MIC's apprehension lies in the practicalities of effectively implementing hudud law within a multiracial and secular nation, as defined by the Federal Constitution.
MIC's Stance on Hudud Law

MIC has clearly stated its opposition to the implementation of hudud law. Rather than solely relying on public statements, the party is pursuing a direct dialogue with PAS to articulate its reservations. The objective of the proposed meeting is for a MIC delegation to convey the specific concerns held by MIC and the broader Indian community regarding the implications of hudud law.
Concerns Regarding Implementation in a Secular, Multiracial State

A significant point of contention for MIC is the feasibility of implementing hudud law in Malaysia, a nation constitutionally recognised as secular and inherently multiracial. While MIC acknowledges that hudud is considered divinely ordained law by Muslims, the party questions how such a legal framework can be effectively integrated and applied within the existing societal and constitutional structure. This raises fundamental questions about legal pluralism and the compatibility of different legal systems in a diverse nation.
Illustrative Concerns on Due Process and Irreversibility

The writer highlights concerns about the practical application of hudud punishments, drawing parallels with the civil legal system. For instance, the case of Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim is cited to illustrate the importance of an appeal process. Had hudud law been in effect during his initial legal challenges, the writer posits, he could have faced severe, irreversible punishments, whereas the civil law system allowed for appeals and eventual acquittal, despite a significant period of imprisonment. Furthermore, the irreversible nature of punishments such as hand amputation is questioned, particularly in scenarios where a person might later be found innocent, raising issues of justice and the possibility of rectifying wrongful convictions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Will MIC and PAS leaders meet to discuss hudud law?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends