Will RM60,000 fines fail to deter repeat water polluters?

Question

Accepted Answer

RM60,000 Fines Are Insufficient to Deter Large Companies from Polluting Waterways

A RM60,000 fine is inadequate to deter large corporations from polluting waterways, particularly when they have a history of similar offenses. The recent water contamination incident in Selangor, which affected nearly 1.2 million consumer accounts, involved a company previously fined RM60,000 for a comparable violation. This suggests that current penalties do not align with the potential severity and widespread impact of such environmental damage, prompting calls for more stringent enforcement and legal consequences.
Existing Legislation Allows for Harsher Penalties

Current legislation, specifically the Water Services Industries Act 2006, provides for penalties significantly exceeding the RM60,000 fine. Under this Act, companies found guilty of such offenses are liable for imprisonment up to ten years, a fine not exceeding RM500,000, or whipping, or a combination of these punishments. These provisions highlight a legal framework that already acknowledges the gravity of water pollution and allows for more deterrent measures than have been applied in practice.
Company Identified as Repeat Offender

The company implicated in the recent Selangor water contamination incident has been identified as a repeat offender. Reports indicate that this same entity had previously been subjected to a RM60,000 penalty for a similar environmental infraction. This history underscores the concern that the existing fine structure is not effectively preventing recurrence, as the company continued its polluting activities despite a prior financial penalty.
Calls for Revocation of Operating Licenses

Beyond financial penalties, there are strong suggestions that more drastic measures are necessary to address repeat offenders. It has been proposed that the operating license of such companies should be revoked, with a complete prohibition on their operations for a period of up to five years. This recommendation stems from the belief that a temporary or permanent removal of their ability to operate is a more effective deterrent than monetary fines, especially for entities that demonstrate a disregard for environmental regulations.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Will RM60,000 fines fail to deter repeat water polluters?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends