Will the Cabinet uphold its 2009 decision on unilateral child conversions?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Cabinet's Stance on Unilateral Child Conversions Remains a Point of Urgency

The Society for the Promotion of Human Rights (Proham) is urging the Cabinet to uphold its April 22, 2009, decision that prohibits the unilateral conversion of children. This call comes in the wake of a recent Court of Appeal ruling in the M. Indira Gandhi case and reports indicating the Prime Minister's principal agreement to review legal amendments aimed at preventing such conversions. Proham emphasizes that the 2009 decision stipulated that the religious status of children within a civil marriage should remain unchanged if one parent converts to Islam, and that children must continue to be raised in the common religion shared at the time of the marriage.
Proham's Call for Adherence to the 2009 Cabinet Decision

Proham has specifically implored the Cabinet to demonstrate the political will necessary to maintain its 2009 resolution. This resolution clearly stated that unilateral conversions of children are not permissible and that offspring from mixed-faith marriages, where one parent converts to Islam, must continue their upbringing in the religion that was common to both parents at the time of their union. The group's statement, released by Ivy Josiah, Datuk Kuthubul Zaman Bukhari, and Datuk A Vaithilingam, underscores the importance of this existing policy.
Context of Recent Legal Developments

The current advocacy by Proham is situated against the backdrop of significant legal events. This includes the recent Court of Appeal judgment concerning M. Indira Gandhi's legal challenge against the unilateral conversion of her three children by their father, who had converted to Islam. Furthermore, recent reports suggest that the Prime Minister has expressed a general willingness to examine potential legal amendments to address and prevent unilateral conversions. These developments have brought the issue to the forefront of public and governmental attention.
Government Actions Regarding Indira Gandhi's Case

In response to the complexities presented by M. Indira Gandhi's specific child custody dispute, several ministers have been appointed to engage in discussions with the Attorney-General. The objective of these discussions is to explore potential solutions to the ongoing legal and familial challenges arising from the case. This inter-ministerial engagement signifies a level of official attention directed towards resolving such sensitive matters.
Proham's Arguments on Parental Rights and International Obligations

Proham has articulated that while supporting the individual's right to religious freedom, the law must provide recourse for non-converting spouses whose rights are impacted by a conversion. The group highlighted that the recent court ruling appeared to diminish Indira's rights as a wife and mother under civil law, and potentially overlooked the rights of her children. Proham also pointed to Malaysia's adherence to international conventions on women and children, which mandate equal parental rights and responsibilities in child-rearing, and cited provisions within Malaysia's Guardianship of Infants Act 1961 that confer equal guardianship rights and consider both parents' wishes in court decisions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Will the Cabinet uphold its 2009 decision on unilateral child conversions?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends